Many assume that admission to guilt is a virtue. Not if you are caught
with your pants down and many more assume that Catholic priests/pastors
are infallible. Big NO! Best bet is ALWAYS be vigilant against your
local priest/pastor. He may spring a surprise when you least expect it.
Wake up people.......faith blindness could be fatal if left
unchecked.......
Click here !!!!!!!
Friday, June 29, 2012
Monday, June 18, 2012
the Bible was not designed to fail anyone.....
Two hundred years ago, give or take,
so-called pilgrim-fathers conquered
native-Indian lands in the name of
their holy book, the Bible and
renamed those lands, the USA, albeit after a lengthy
process.
Going by the degree of their sacred book,
they branded the natives as 'heathen'
thus giving themselves a blank cheque
to rape, pillage and plunder thus forcing the defenseless
Indians into submission by ransacking their
villages and going on to control
all that they owned.
Unlike the Muslim Malay natives in old Malaya
who knew how and when to kick the
hypocritical bible-toting white-man
in their ample backsides by knowing
what is haram and halal, the poor
American Indians on the other hand
did not have privy to that 'defense-mechanism'.
Their beliefs, apparently, did not seem
to draw any line between what was right
or wrong. The white-man's good-time code
of wine, woman and song was the order of the day
that saw the native Indians blindly surrendering
themselves, their families, their lands, not
forgetting their souls to what the white man
had, misleading themselves into believing
that the white man's God was superior.
Armed with this very same book, another
horde of white men took cue from their
native-Indian conquering counterparts and repeated
the process down under in Australia
where various colonies voted in a referendum
to unite in a Federation that came into
being in 1901, thus catapulting the native
Aborigines into social and economic
oblivion. Here again, the Aborigines
were without an in-built defense-mechanism,
unlike their Muslim Malay counterparts
in Peninsula Malaya.
In New Zealand, the Treaty Of Waitangi
was signed between the British Crown
and various Maori chiefs, thus bringing
New Zealand into the British Empire
and giving the Maoris equal rights with
British citizens. Sounds good so far
but it did not end there. War and imposition
of a European economic legal system
(based on their Holy Book, one can
assume) led to most of New Zealand's land
passing from Maori to 'Paheka'
(European ownership) and most Maori
subsequently became impoverished.
Here again, was the sorry absence of that defense-
mechanism amongst the Maoris. The one that
empowered the Muslim Malays
to drive out the white man and take their
destiny in their own hands.
So, here we have it. Three native-owned
lands, conquered by a bunch of misled
misfits who were literally conned into
thinking they were doing it for their
god, king and country all in the name of a grotesquely-distorted
book, re-authored, re-penned, re-written,
doctored, manipulated, fabricated for the
selfish ends of the church.
Question. Would there be a white America,
Australia or a New Zealand
if natives from those respective countries were
Muslims like our Muslim Malay brethren?
Wouldn't they have the 'defense-mechanism'
to say 'yes' to what is acceptable and 'no' to what
is not, thus sending the white man packing
instead of falling hook, line and sinker to his
convoluted notion of what is right and wrong
based on his distorted book?
The debate on the contradictions in the New
Testament have been ongoing ever since
the dawn of Pauline Christianity, 1500 odd
years ago when the Church's power-base
shifted from Jerusalem to Rome. Saul of
Tarsus also known as Paul, in his attempt to placate the
hedonistic Romans, re-wrote the laws,
thus saturating and seriously compromising the laws of Moses
which Lord Jesus himself strictly-adhered to in every sense
of the word.
Which brings us to the question,
'Has the Bible failed modern families?'
(Wed May 16th 2012). No, the Bible
was not designed to fail anybody. It is
man's interference and blatant doctoring of it's divine message
for his own selfish ends, that has failed the generations
that came after and will continue to do so if they
fail to indulge in comparative religious studies
that requires one to accept messages that came after.
For the uninitiated, please take note that
Lord Jesus was not a white man, never is
and will never be. Truer traditions have him
described as stocky with a tanned Mediterranean
skin and frizzy hair. Closer to the what the
Israelites were before they became
Europeanised during their 2000-year
wandering period that culminated
with the holocaust and the controversial setting up
so-called pilgrim-fathers conquered
native-Indian lands in the name of
their holy book, the Bible and
renamed those lands, the USA, albeit after a lengthy
process.
Going by the degree of their sacred book,
they branded the natives as 'heathen'
thus giving themselves a blank cheque
to rape, pillage and plunder thus forcing the defenseless
Indians into submission by ransacking their
villages and going on to control
all that they owned.
Unlike the Muslim Malay natives in old Malaya
who knew how and when to kick the
hypocritical bible-toting white-man
in their ample backsides by knowing
what is haram and halal, the poor
American Indians on the other hand
did not have privy to that 'defense-mechanism'.
Their beliefs, apparently, did not seem
to draw any line between what was right
or wrong. The white-man's good-time code
of wine, woman and song was the order of the day
that saw the native Indians blindly surrendering
themselves, their families, their lands, not
forgetting their souls to what the white man
had, misleading themselves into believing
that the white man's God was superior.
Armed with this very same book, another
horde of white men took cue from their
native-Indian conquering counterparts and repeated
the process down under in Australia
where various colonies voted in a referendum
to unite in a Federation that came into
being in 1901, thus catapulting the native
Aborigines into social and economic
oblivion. Here again, the Aborigines
were without an in-built defense-mechanism,
unlike their Muslim Malay counterparts
in Peninsula Malaya.
In New Zealand, the Treaty Of Waitangi
was signed between the British Crown
and various Maori chiefs, thus bringing
New Zealand into the British Empire
and giving the Maoris equal rights with
British citizens. Sounds good so far
but it did not end there. War and imposition
of a European economic legal system
(based on their Holy Book, one can
assume) led to most of New Zealand's land
passing from Maori to 'Paheka'
(European ownership) and most Maori
subsequently became impoverished.
Here again, was the sorry absence of that defense-
mechanism amongst the Maoris. The one that
empowered the Muslim Malays
to drive out the white man and take their
destiny in their own hands.
So, here we have it. Three native-owned
lands, conquered by a bunch of misled
misfits who were literally conned into
thinking they were doing it for their
god, king and country all in the name of a grotesquely-distorted
book, re-authored, re-penned, re-written,
doctored, manipulated, fabricated for the
selfish ends of the church.
Question. Would there be a white America,
Australia or a New Zealand
if natives from those respective countries were
Muslims like our Muslim Malay brethren?
Wouldn't they have the 'defense-mechanism'
to say 'yes' to what is acceptable and 'no' to what
is not, thus sending the white man packing
instead of falling hook, line and sinker to his
convoluted notion of what is right and wrong
based on his distorted book?
The debate on the contradictions in the New
Testament have been ongoing ever since
the dawn of Pauline Christianity, 1500 odd
years ago when the Church's power-base
shifted from Jerusalem to Rome. Saul of
Tarsus also known as Paul, in his attempt to placate the
hedonistic Romans, re-wrote the laws,
thus saturating and seriously compromising the laws of Moses
which Lord Jesus himself strictly-adhered to in every sense
of the word.
Which brings us to the question,
'Has the Bible failed modern families?'
(Wed May 16th 2012). No, the Bible
was not designed to fail anybody. It is
man's interference and blatant doctoring of it's divine message
for his own selfish ends, that has failed the generations
that came after and will continue to do so if they
fail to indulge in comparative religious studies
that requires one to accept messages that came after.
For the uninitiated, please take note that
Lord Jesus was not a white man, never is
and will never be. Truer traditions have him
described as stocky with a tanned Mediterranean
skin and frizzy hair. Closer to the what the
Israelites were before they became
Europeanised during their 2000-year
wandering period that culminated
with the holocaust and the controversial setting up
of the Jewish state in 1948.
Monday, May 28, 2012
Sorry, no miracles here. Just Willie toying with the latest gizmos at his disposal..........(Buzz over Jesus 'sighting')
Recent press reports indicate a 'miracle'
of sorts (in the form of an apparition of Lord Jesus)
has happened in the church
of Our Lady Of Good Health, Kg Pandan.
It is strange that occurrences of such nature
did not happen during the tenure of a more
deserving priest, Fr Anthony Thomas,
whose tireless church-building efforts
have brought both churches to what it is
today for the current 'gook in residence',
'Thoosai' (Christopher Wilvaraj Soosai @ Thoosai)
to shamelessly take all the credit.
But then again, it also looks like
'Wily Willie @ Thoosai' is up to the
old shenanigans which the church
has been indulging for the past
1500 years.
Conjuring up apparitions, magic and miracles
has somewhat been the mainstay of the 'unholy'
church to primarily draw in the multitude and
subsequently, draw in the funds from these
pitiful unsuspecting souls which has kept jobless-bachelors
(priests, bishops, cardinals, popes and their ilk) well-fed
for these past 1500 years.
However, 'credit' must go to 'Wiley Willie' for
pulling off this unholy caper which actually did
draw in a large crowd and then pulling out the
said lectern before any investigation could be
carried out to expose the theological-fraud.
The gook definitely has hit not 2 but 3 birds
with one stone with this piece that could even
give Copperfield a run for his money.
Firstly, drawing attention to himself, secondly,
creating an impression that Lord Jesus favours
his tenure at the church and thirdly, which was
his main objective, draw in the funds from the
unsuspecting crowd.
Man, this guy deserves
an award. Holy Father, are you reading this?
How else can one explain why the said lectern
was removed and why queries from the reporter
of the said tabloid was met with a blunt,
"No Comment".
Everyone who is familiar with the parish, knows
that the progressive development of both the
Sacred Heart, Jln Peel and Our Lady Of Good Health,
Kg Pandan is owed to the foresight of of the
previous parish priest, Fr Anthony Thomas.
Is 'Wily Willie' feeling the pressure to outdo
the performance of the latter? Hence the lowly
and unholy caper to draw attention to himself?
Where Rev Fr Anthony Thomas, through divine
intervention, performed actual miracles in the name
of the lord, by raising the operational standards
of both the churches to par excellence, 'Wily Willie',
a virtual 'Johnny-come-lately' appears to be content
feeding off the sweat of the former.
Perhaps he is aware that he is no priestly-material.
Hence the need to create a "miraculous" scene
like the one that was reported.
With today's technology at Willie's disposal,
one could say, 'Anything's possible when
Willie runs the show'.
However, it would be a sad day when the
unsuspecting adherents fall hook, line
and sinker for his cheap shots at
attention-grabbing theatrics.
(facebook posting on 1st sept. 2011)
Friday, May 25, 2012
need political or monetary mileage ?....be controversial !!!!
A controversial liberal-Islam writer challenges critics to explain how God
could have made 'misfits' and 'abominations'. Perhaps they
said the same thing at Sodom and Gomorrah just before
it rained fire and brimstone, destroying all and sundry.
For the good author's information, the good Lord does
not go around creating 'misfits' and 'abominations'.
Only man does. We cannot go on blaming the Creator
for things that go wrong when the blame is on us
for neglecting his laws.
One would have taken her seriously if she had uttered
the phrase with conviction and not to justify her lesbianic
orientation or against a backdrop of promoting her book.
Just as a production of an automobile that comes with
a maintenance manual on how to best upkeep the said
vehicle, the creation of man, too came with an instruction-
manual (the respective holy books) on how to best maintain
oneself in the spiritual and physical context by the Creator's degree.
It is the neglect of this book in one's formative years that give
rise to to so-called 'misfits and 'abominations'.
If the good Lord had meant for gays and lesbians to be okay,
he would definitely have made the human genitalia,
completely detachable and interchangeable.
Incidentally, there have been numerous cases
of rapists and pedophiles whose victims have
been willing partners. Is the author implying
that they too be warmly accepted into society ?
Doesn't she realise that such cases could have
been the result of unaddressed issues in one's
formative years? Perhaps she may want to
include bestials? (people who indulge in
consensual sex with animals) or perhaps
necrophiles (sex with corpses). Heck! they
are people too, she could argue.
Come on, we all know where this is leading
to. US President, Obama has done it (recognizing
same-sex marriages) thus compromising
his beliefs to keep alive his presidential-bid.
So why not the said author, compromising
her spiritual beliefs for a healthier bank-balance
from her already controversial book and who
can forget Salman Rushdie who only had the
courage to inflame Muslim sensitivities
when he was in the west but not when he
was residing in Delhi.
Apparently, courting controversy seems to be
the mantra for anyone who needs political or monetary
mileage and the author in question is no exception.
could have made 'misfits' and 'abominations'. Perhaps they
said the same thing at Sodom and Gomorrah just before
it rained fire and brimstone, destroying all and sundry.
For the good author's information, the good Lord does
not go around creating 'misfits' and 'abominations'.
Only man does. We cannot go on blaming the Creator
for things that go wrong when the blame is on us
for neglecting his laws.
One would have taken her seriously if she had uttered
the phrase with conviction and not to justify her lesbianic
orientation or against a backdrop of promoting her book.
Just as a production of an automobile that comes with
a maintenance manual on how to best upkeep the said
vehicle, the creation of man, too came with an instruction-
manual (the respective holy books) on how to best maintain
oneself in the spiritual and physical context by the Creator's degree.
It is the neglect of this book in one's formative years that give
rise to to so-called 'misfits and 'abominations'.
If the good Lord had meant for gays and lesbians to be okay,
he would definitely have made the human genitalia,
completely detachable and interchangeable.
Incidentally, there have been numerous cases
of rapists and pedophiles whose victims have
been willing partners. Is the author implying
that they too be warmly accepted into society ?
Doesn't she realise that such cases could have
been the result of unaddressed issues in one's
formative years? Perhaps she may want to
include bestials? (people who indulge in
consensual sex with animals) or perhaps
necrophiles (sex with corpses). Heck! they
are people too, she could argue.
Come on, we all know where this is leading
to. US President, Obama has done it (recognizing
same-sex marriages) thus compromising
his beliefs to keep alive his presidential-bid.
So why not the said author, compromising
her spiritual beliefs for a healthier bank-balance
from her already controversial book and who
can forget Salman Rushdie who only had the
courage to inflame Muslim sensitivities
when he was in the west but not when he
was residing in Delhi.
Apparently, courting controversy seems to be
the mantra for anyone who needs political or monetary
mileage and the author in question is no exception.
True faces of the Vatican ........
Tabloids report that Philippines Archbishop,
Ramon Arguelles has urged the public to boycott
the concert of US artiste, Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta,
also known by her stage name of Lady Gaga, proudly stating
that 'her fans are in danger of falling into the clutches of
Satan'. Shudder !!!!!!!
Perhaps someone ought to remind the good Archbishop
that the singer in question is a by-product of the Catholic Church
(The Church Of Lucifer in disguise) which he so proudly represents and serves
without question, THE MAN IN THE RED SHOES WHO WEARS
HIS OWN PERFUME URGING THE WORLD TO THINK
OF THE POOR WHILE HE HIMSELF SITS IN LUCIFERIAN
OPULENCE AS OPPOSED TO THE TRUE FOLLOWERS OF
CHRIST.
All she (Lady Gaga) needs to gain recognition and acceptance within
the church heir-achy is to make a hefty contribution
to the papal coffers and wallah, she'll be 'a child of the
most high' and granted an audience at the blink of an eye
as with her predecessor, Louise Ciccone @ Madonna,
another by-product of the Catholic Church.
The only difference between Lady Gaga and ordinary
adherents is she has taken her beliefs to a higher,
(non-hypocritical) level which, apparently, annoys
the demonic elements in the Vatican who are fearful
of being exposed.
Lady Gaga, Madonna and several other artistes in their
wake are reflective of the true face of the Vatican
which incidentally, keeps them on their
hoofs (pun intended) and while on the subject,
how can we forget Catholic-indoctrinated, 'exemplary'
statesmen such as Adolphy Hitler and Bobby Mugabe
to name a few.
Archbishop Arguelles has apparently, missed
the plot. Instead of urging his flock to swat
the hornet, he should be indoctrinating them
to annihilate the hornet's nest at the 'Fatican'.
Ramon Arguelles has urged the public to boycott
the concert of US artiste, Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta,
also known by her stage name of Lady Gaga, proudly stating
that 'her fans are in danger of falling into the clutches of
Satan'. Shudder !!!!!!!
Perhaps someone ought to remind the good Archbishop
that the singer in question is a by-product of the Catholic Church
(The Church Of Lucifer in disguise) which he so proudly represents and serves
without question, THE MAN IN THE RED SHOES WHO WEARS
HIS OWN PERFUME URGING THE WORLD TO THINK
OF THE POOR WHILE HE HIMSELF SITS IN LUCIFERIAN
OPULENCE AS OPPOSED TO THE TRUE FOLLOWERS OF
CHRIST.
All she (Lady Gaga) needs to gain recognition and acceptance within
the church heir-achy is to make a hefty contribution
to the papal coffers and wallah, she'll be 'a child of the
most high' and granted an audience at the blink of an eye
as with her predecessor, Louise Ciccone @ Madonna,
another by-product of the Catholic Church.
The only difference between Lady Gaga and ordinary
adherents is she has taken her beliefs to a higher,
(non-hypocritical) level which, apparently, annoys
the demonic elements in the Vatican who are fearful
of being exposed.
Lady Gaga, Madonna and several other artistes in their
wake are reflective of the true face of the Vatican
which incidentally, keeps them on their
hoofs (pun intended) and while on the subject,
how can we forget Catholic-indoctrinated, 'exemplary'
statesmen such as Adolphy Hitler and Bobby Mugabe
to name a few.
Archbishop Arguelles has apparently, missed
the plot. Instead of urging his flock to swat
the hornet, he should be indoctrinating them
to annihilate the hornet's nest at the 'Fatican'.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Sorry, no miracles here. Just Willie toying with the latest gizmos at his disposal..........(Buzz over Jesus 'sighting')
Recent press reports indicate a 'miracle'
of sorts (in the form of an apparition of Lord Jesus)
has happened in the church
of Our Lady Of Good Health, Kg Pandan.
It is strange that occurrences of such nature
did not happen during the tenure of a more
deserving priest, Pastor Anthony Thomas,
whose tireless church-building efforts
have brought both churches to what it is
today for the current 'gook in residence',
'Thoosai' (Christopher Wilvaraj Soosai @ Thoosai)
to shamelessly take all the credit.
But then again, it also looks like
'Wily Willie @ Thoosai' is up to the
old shenanigans which the church
has been indulging for the past
1500 years.
Conjuring up apparitions, magic and miracles
has somewhat been the mainstay of the 'unholy'
church to primarily draw in the multitude and
subsequently, draw in the funds from these
pitiful unsuspecting souls which has kept jobless-bachelors
(priests, bishops, cardinals, popes and their ilk) well-fed
for these past 1500 years.
However, 'credit' must go to 'Wiley Willie' for
pulling off this unholy caper which actually did
draw in a large crowd and then pulling out the
said lectern before any investigation could be
carried out to expose the theological-fraud.
The gook definitely has hit not 2 but 3 birds
with one stone with this piece that could even
give Copperfield a run for his money.
Firstly, drawing attention to himself, secondly,
creating an impression that Lord Jesus favours
his tenure at the church and thirdly, which was
his main objective, draw in the funds from the
unsuspecting crowd.
Man, this guy deserves
an award. Holy Father, are you reading this?
How else can one explain why the said lectern
was removed and why queries from the reporter
of the said tabloid was met with a blunt,
"No Comment".
Everyone who is familiar with the parish, knows
that the progressive development of both the
Sacred Heart, Jln Peel and Our Lady Of Good Health,
Kg Pandan is owed to the foresight of of the
previous parish priest, Fr Anthony Thomas.
Is 'Wily Willie' feeling the pressure to outdo
the performance of the latter? Hence the lowly
and unholy caper to draw attention to himself?
Where Rev Fr Anthony Thomas, through divine
intervention, performed actual miracles in the name
of the lord, by raising the operational standards
of both the churches to par excellence, 'Wily Willie',
a virtual 'Johnny-come-lately' appears to be content
feeding off the sweat of the former.
Perhaps he is aware that he is no priestly-material.
Hence the need to create a "miraculous" scene
like the one that was reported.
With today's technology at Willie's disposal,
one could say, 'Anything's possible when
Willie runs the show'.
However, it would be a sad day when the
unsuspecting adherents fall hook, line
and sinker for his cheap shots at
attention-grabbing theatrics.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
The Papal Cult ............
John Paul II is enthusiastically revered by most Catholics for his evident personal holiness and iron will. He is highly-esteemed by non-Catholics the world over for his stand on moral principles and although many who praise him on this score are not bound by his strictures. But for progressive Catholics, and a vast marginalised faithful, he is perceived as a stumbling block and a contradiction.
Under John Paul II, Catholicism was almost a one-man show: the Vatican's publicity machine and large sections of the Catholic media ensure that his voice and words, his opinions and verdicts are broadcast daily and amplified throughout the world.....(to be contd)
(an excerpt from 'Breaking Faith'
by John Cornwell)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)