Tuesday, November 27, 2012

"Uncle Ben needs you in the Vatican army!"



"Come to me, my sons, come to el Papa!"
 Ben elevates 6 new cardinals.....
click here to read .........

Sure, why not! Especially when the Vatican's European base appears to be waning (which obviously, he's not telling). Ben, now attempts to reach out to others whom for ages were considered 'children of a lesser God'  by the papal elite.

Wow! an Indian pope or perhaps a Nigerian one (if the traditional Europeans aren't interested) or even a cowboy pope (US) to bolster the papal coffers. Unprecedented or desperate.

Yes! anything to keep the charade going and pray tell, why the emphasis on 'Universal Church' as if we need reminding.

Perhaps the Europeans are beginning to see the light, as evident by their bare churches which now thrive on tourism dollars to keep the ample bellies of their jobless 'gooks' (priests), filled to the brim ......and overflowing.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Catholic hypocrisy to the hilt ........

Tabloid reports reveal that more than 100,000 (though that figure is disputed) protestors, organized by Catholic groups staged separate demos in French cities protesting against Government plans to legalize same-sex marriages. Kudos to them for adhering to the Biblical story of Sodom & Gomorrah. (Apparently there are many Elton fans in the French cabinet).

 click here to read the story

For all we know the very community they are protesting against may comprise victims of their neighborhood pedophilic Catholic priest, considering the fact that nearly 90% of France is Roman Catholic. As the saying goes, psychologically-damaged individuals make a fertile ground for homosexual tendencies to thrive.

The reports further state that though marching separately, they chanted the same slogan, "ONE FATHER+ONE MOTHER FOR ALL CHILDREN". How touching.

While they're at it, they should also add "NO CHURCH-FATHER OR UNHOLY FATHER (IN THE VATICAN) FOR MY INNOCENT CHILDREN, ONLY HEAVENLY FATHER".

It's grossly hypocritical for these Catholic groups to make a 'song and dance' over a matter that pales in comparison (though it needs serious attention too) to the countless pedophilic acts committed by the so-called people of the cloth while head-honcho 'Benny' (Benedict) sits behind the comfort-zone of the Vat walls, conveniently  choosing to keep silent over an issue which has remained unaddressed since the dark ages.

Welcome to another showcase of Catholic hypocrisy to the hilt.




Thursday, November 22, 2012

Virgin Mary transferred while the church readies it's coffers .........




'Mary transferred' to a more 'secure' place (as if she needs taking care of) by people who need to be taken care off, themselves ............

.....click to see the story here.

The reason why the Virgin Mary appeared outside a church is to convey the message that one needn't have to be an 'ordained churclite' to believe in her as she prefers to be seen as a universal symbol (just as Yeshua, her son) and not the sole propriety of the church.

Just as how the good name of Yeshua was usurped by that questionable organization called the church, 1500 years ago, to lend credibility to their skewered Paulinist doctrines, the church once again has usurped the image of the VM from neutral grounds to be placed inside their house of worship to draw attention to themselves, not forgetting the funds, this phenomenon could draw.

Adherents should be urged to flock to this church and get a good glimpse of this image but make all donations to a poor home of their choice and not to that church in question.

It's the only way to see what questionable motives the church has in displaying the image without any explanation as to what were the elements involved that caused the apparition. If it was paint material, then it can be written off. If it was embedded in glass by means not available on this planet, then it's worth a second look.

Adherents would be advised to snap as much pictures as possible as it is feared that it's the only image they will be clinging on to once the image fades as the church environment is not conducive for miraculous phenomena to survive which explains why most miracles happen outside it's vicinity.

Finally, contrary to popular belief that this masterpiece of a song, first written in 1969 (see vid below) was in dedication to the BVM by Beatle Paul, it was in fact (as the Beatle himself pointed out in a later interview) dedicated to his late mother, also named Mary who died of embolism when he (Paul) was 14.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

ZORRO Truly Unmasked .......


The latest in a sea of blogging profanity. An opportunistic tirade of insults directed mainly against Malays as a race and Islam. Hiding behind that thin veil of opposition to the Barisan government, UMNO and religious fundamentalism in Malaysia is one Zorro supposedly Unmasked.

WHO LIES BEHIND THAT MASK ?
Bernard Khoo by all reliable accounts was a fully ordained Catholic De La Salle Brother. A thug and a bully protected by his cassock worn as a Catholic Brother at the La Salle School Kelang where he taught in the mid to late 1960’s.
A karate black belt, he assaulted, threatened, vilified, mentally and physically abused a number of students of that school. His victims mainly Indians and Malays. All of this he dished out during his tenure as a Catholic Brother at that school.
Bernard is also vividly remembered by his victims as enforcer to another Chinese chauvinist of that period, another hoodlum parading as a missionary at that school. The irascible Reverend Brother John Neo, a cantankerous individual was the then principal of La Salle School Kelang.
Collectively they are remembered for their reign of terror and the resultant psychological damage inflicted on the vulnerable and the weak in their charge during that period and possibly beyond. To many of their victims the scars will always remain as an everlasting reminder of Bernard Khoo, John Neo and their variety of justice, truth and fairness.



NOTHING NOBLE ABOUT THIS ZORRO- HIS ATTITUDE TOWARDS INDIANS AND MALAYS
Bernard Khoo aka Zorro Unmasked had a pre occupation with intimidation. He, according to the testimony of some of his victims who won’t forget the man, appeared to derive a perverse sense of satisfaction and pleasure out of intimidation and bullying of those he considered weaker and by implication lesser beings than himself. Children of a lesser god.
Bernard Khoo also willingly undertook that same sadistic ’duty’ on behalf of his fellow bully and minority tormentor Brother John Neo, referred to irreverently then by his students as Mao Tze Tung for John Neo’s proclaimed and unabashed affection and admiration for that late Chinese dictatorial tyrant.
John Neo was also an ardent admirer of Lee Kuan Yew and the latters attitude towards Malays. He never gave up an opportunity to espouse the views of Lee on the Malays and to denegrate Malay students of that time, much to their embarassment and humiliation, in the presence of their overwhelming non Malay fellow students.
The Malays (the few who enjoyed the privilege of entry to a Catholic school) were systematically insulted as was the norm in those days. Such behaviour was not only practiced by just John Neo and Bernard Khoo. It was also the staple of some students at the school, encouraged by the conduct of their peers the Brothers of Bernard Khoo’s ilk.
Admittedly and thankfully so, as relayed to us by former students of that school, not all Catholic Brothers fell into that category of pathological racists as John Neo and Bernard Khoo were. But it was nonetheless not uncommon for the Brotherhood and the Priesthood in Catholicism to attract a disproportionately large number of these types from the local communities as recruits to their vocational ranks.
The Malays then were systemically treated as an outcast minority in these schools (with about 2 allowed in each class) even though their numbers in the population betrayed the distorted representation in enrollment of Malays in Catholic and other Christian schools in the 1960′s and 1970′s.
This too in a country, their own, that exclusion being inflicted on them a majority by a foreign Church preaching fairness and equality, Christ like charity and love. The same church that is now feigning outrage at the Al Islam publication of an essay on holy communion.
The Indians, many of whom were Tamils at the time, were a particularly soft target for physical and mental abuse. They then being on the lowest rung of the socio economic ladder, were persistently harassed, demeaned and bullied by Bernard Khoo and his fellow religious thugs.
There are at least 3 reported suicides amongst Indian workers and students at that school during that era of Bernard Khoo, John Neo and Alban Senan although other sources attest to a larger number perhaps twice that figure given.
They the Tamils did not dare resist Bernard and his cohorts bullying and assaults for fear of retribution in punitive physical form.
From this champion of freedom and justice they were perhaps instilled with the power of fear, intimidation and violence as a motivator. A lesson which some undoubtedly have gone on to take up after leaving school contributing to the disproportionate numbers from their ranks in violent crime in Malaysia .
If anyone did dare stand up or resist his bullying and that of yet another thug of that era, one Brother Alban Senan (an unmitigated, pathological sadist and racist) they paid a price in unspeakable humiliation and fear that has indisputably shaped their lives in a manner the community now lives to regret.
All of this the result of very Christian charitable conduct condoned and carried out under the watchful eye of the Roman Catholic Church and the principal of the school Brother John Neo.
Now we bear witness to one of that gang running a website, regurgitating the profanities of his discredited mantra of anti Islamic slogans of the Bush era expecting the same unquestioning responses out of fear through intimidation perhaps from his readers as he demanded of his young students then.

IS ZORRO’S PAST A REFLECTION OF THE MAN TODAY?
Today Bernard Khoo parades in his new persona as champion of the causes of missing children, clean government and democratic values. A noble pursuit indeed if Bernard Khoo did have the personal or moral integrity to throw stones at a government struggling to come to grips with its inherited burden of the British Empire the avaricious ingrates of mainly Chinese (and sprinkling of Indians) left behind at independence.
Bernard Khoo’s amorphous ideas of corruption and his championing the cause of children on his website are at best hypocritical, obscene and as unconvincing an attempt at showing a human face as Adolph Hitler’s much touted fondness for animals and his vegetarian lifestyle were attempts to dignify the latters deeds against humanity.
It is also an unwelcome and cruel reminder to those who suffered at his hands under that reign of tyranny. It has been said by many of his former victims that he ought to be outed and not trusted with the welfare or the causes of anyone let alone helpless children.
With his history of traumatising and assaulting minors ( which most students were at that relevant time) under his care, he has little credibility if any to take a stand on issues he claims disturb him enough to want to leave a legacy of change for a better world for his grandchildren.
Zorrro aka Brother Arnold aka Bernard Khoo’s public posturing on issues is an insult to children and to right thinking people who seek refuge from intimidation, bullying, violence and tyranny of every sort.
To allow Bernard Khoo aka Zorro Unmasked to continue with this public charade of his new persona when, his victims unwittingly have turned out to be the catalyst and reason perhaps for all that he demands changed in society today, is to abet the offences of this man’s past.
Bernard Khoo’s idea of welfare and good governance are not compatible with those universally accepted definitions of those same concepts. Bernard Khoo has not yet seen it fit to publicly apologise to his victims for his grievous and criminal misconduct as a religious Brother.
He abused that office of his as a religious Brother and teacher under the protection of a powerful Catholic church like his mentor Brother John Neo and the other thug and bully at the time Brother Alban Senan.

CAN A LEOPARD CHANGE ITS SPOTS?
Brother Arnold aka Zorro Unmasked now wants the world to believe he is some paragon of virtue by calling himself Zorro though still demonstrating that totalitarian self righteous mindset by excising from his blog any contribution that is even remotely at variance to his own chauvinistic views.
He spews his contumely like his other blogger vandals on Malays with the type of unsubstantiated and unwarranted claims against them he and his cohorts in the media churn out on a daily basis.
The man needs to be unmasked. He has his coterie of sycophants and apologists and that’s fine. They include former students who believe that he is forever entitled to the unquestioning respect he once fraudulently claimed (or demanded) as a religious Brother and teacher. And there are those who will seek to at any cost protect the man’s lack of integrity simply because he held sway over them once and claimed to be a man of God (ever heard of the battered wife syndrome or the Stockholm syndrome?). Such are the failings of victims and the impact of bullying on them.

LEST WE FORGET
But then again there are those, particularly his victims, who are just as capable as Bernard Khoo is of speaking out to stoke those sentiments sufficient to rail the public against real hatred, racism and the prejudices of the type people like Bernard Koo are capable of.
There is a sense of duty in many and it is encouraging to see that his victims no longer feel the need to suffer as victims and speak out now decades after the man’s rampage on the weak.
His victims will emerge in larger numbers and expose the root of all that is dysfunctional in Malaysian society today. That indoctrination into violence and intimidation imbued in them and sanctified by religion even though it has for so long been so conveniently swept under the carpet and given illegitimate credence by that veneer of religious cover.
Driven by a greater zeal and motivation for justice, these victims who have voices and who have discovered the power of their voices, come out to speak with greater conviction than when they don’t speak out and suffer in silence.

CONCLUSION
This tit for tat is not over by a long shot yet. Malaysians like any other group have to question the motives of those who stir up trouble for the slightest cause in a volatile environment as Malaysia is today.
A good starting point for the likes of Bernard Khoo to consider when vilifying others is that old saying “let him that is without sin cast the first stone”. It comes from a religious doctrine Bernard Khoo once subscribed to.
The argument that is raging against the Barisan may be legitimate. But no one is asking the question, who is the Barisan? Is it just UMNO or is it UMNO and others such as the MCA and MIC? Is it perhaps also the unaccountable former deputy finance minister whose husband as owner of a large public bank benefitted from inside information as a result of her use of confidential cabinet sensitive information? .
The husband and wife in that particular example are both Chinese.
Is it Samy Velu and corruption of the MAIKA affair during his stewardship of MIC? or is it the also the elements of MIC whose physical abuse of an actor turned porn star, or the misappropriation of hundreds of millions of dollars of money allocated and destined for poorer Indians.
Samy Velu and the MIC are not Malay either.
Yet no one asks. Who pays the piper playing that ugly tune of anti Malay anti Muslim sentiments using a small band of disgruntled Malays as their shield.
No one yet has had the intelligence to query the motives and the character of those making these bilious and vitriolic statements against individuals and groups of people like the Malays without a proper mandate from anyone but themselves, yet claiming to act for the ‘righteous democratic majority’. Yep sure!!

Gopal Raj Kumar

30 Comments on “ZORRO TRULY UNMASKED”

  1. qwerty September 7, 2009 at 8:23 am #
    Wow. you sound so anti-chinese, whether or not that is your intention. I actually find your entry abit disturbing. You seem to take the shortcomings of one person and generalize it to the entire community? You seem to take Singapore’s political actions and again, generalize it to the rest. And then, one more thing, I am a Catholic and I don’t subscribe to their doctrine on who should or should not go to heaven. In fact I am strongly against that belief and I get slightly annoyed if certain folks try to evangelise that idea to me.
    Hm.. chill lah.. get a chinese friend and maybe you will find not all of them are evil.
    • grkumar September 7, 2009 at 9:12 am #
      An interesting response. What do you find anti Chinese about the post? We assume you are referring to the one about Zorro (Unmasked). We have deleted most of the posts to date on this subject because of the emotions it has raised amongst former students and polarised the debate. A raw nerve indeed.
      We have taken complaints from his former students some saying we were too lenient others who provided extreme examples of his and his cohorts conduct against students whilst others still think we have been unfair to target him (Bernard Khoo). Unless we are able to verify these we will not publish and reserve these postings for a later date.
      Whats interesting about this particular post is that it has now also raised the hidden taboo issue of padeophilia by priests and brothers during that era. Not in Kelang but elsewhere. We will continue to investigate and keep you posted.
      GRK
  2. TChan September 7, 2009 at 5:51 pm #
    There are definitely many people like ‘Zorro’ out there, and ‘qwerty’ is one of them. These people go around parading their muhibbah spirit but fact is that they are the racist ones. These specimens are more dangerous than Amno, they breed like bacteria and viruses pretending to be your friend, and then…BAM!
    @ GRK
    Pls keep us informed on this matter. I knew that old man has skeletons in his closet.
  3. Bill Bartmann September 18, 2009 at 6:02 am #
    This blog rocks! I gotta say, that I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,
    A definite great read…:)
    -Bill-Bartmann
  4. Malaysian Malay September 24, 2009 at 7:33 am #
    I would humbly suggest that the author of this ‘whatever you may want to call it’ apply some degree of innovation. The rather verbose article has all the trimmings of an UMNO spin which must include – a) Chinese personalities with gangster tendencies b) Communist (read Mao Zedong) symphaties c) Abuse of religion d) Association with Lee Kwan Yew e) Abusing Malays (the inclusion of the pseudo-Indians was meant to provide a balance) f) The dillema of majorities and minorities. Now, have we not read enough of such rubbish applying these themes? What remains a mystrey though would be the exclusion of the Zionist movement, CIA, George Soros and anti-monarchial tendencies. This is a typical Spin101 so I need not reiterate the value of such callous endeavour.
    A Malaysian Malay
    • grkumar September 24, 2009 at 11:37 am #
      A good starting point would be to use a name you could lend credibility to. Jools instead of whayever it is that makes you ashamed of yourself and resort to Jools 1958 and refer to me as an UMNO spinner. Your somewhat bizzare reference to the CIA Soros and the Zionists in this context is further reinforcement of the quality of your analysis of the Chan criticism. But we are all entitled to our flaws. You to yours I to mine.
      As to the issues you have raised on the Chan critique, let me categorically and unequivocally put to rest your feeble claim that the man put proof to his assertions. His reference to cases and to quotes are embellishments and adornments which a good substantive argument does not need.
      Verbose, well my friend perhaps you ought to find the definition of verbose and apply it where it belongs in the pejorative you apply to me. Chan failed to identify the core principle on the question of the Sultan’s discretion. The arguments he raises does not get up for his failure in this regard to identify the core issues of the argument on the crisis. To quote archaic and irrlevant English Law Lords in his inimicable ‘kow towing’ style is embarassing. He has led nothing of substance that could do him or his argument any justice.
      A judge who fails the primary test of impartiality by entering into a debate of a political nature and does so with little substance other than unimpressive irrelevant quotes deserves to have strips torn of his back. It is not what I did. I wish I could though. Another time another place.
      Chan’s arguments have been published in many forms. None of them worthy of redemption. Fire your best shot. Identify the substantive argument in mine that you find wanting in.
      Gopal Raj Kumar
  5. beruk PR September 24, 2009 at 3:36 pm #
    A Malaysian Malay..
    Is somehow having the addiction of posting the same thing at all websites and blogs he visitied…
    is he really is a Malaysian Malay??
  6. donplaypuks September 25, 2009 at 5:02 pm #
    A lot of general statements without 1 actual incident quoted to substantiate your scurillous allegations against Bernard Khoo. This sounds like the Utusan, NST et al MSM who frequently BS about “unnanmed anonymous sources’ when they actually have no real evidence.
    Like so many today, you use racism to denigrate a person thinking that people will fall for it. Tell us in plain english where and how Bernard Khoo aka Zorro unmasked ultra vires the Indians, Malays and Islam. I bet that you can’t, because it never happened. You are just seeking cheap publicity!
    I would not be too surprised if you were some UMNO blogger in disguise trying to bring down a popular blogger held in high esteem by many. And make no mistake, you will fail miserably!!
    dpp
    We are all of 1 race, the Human Race
    • grkumar September 25, 2009 at 8:02 pm #
      No need to. Whats important is that if any of the statements are false, Bernard Khoo can speak for himself and serve process against us for carrying anything he believes is defamatory of him. Ultra Vires against Indians and Malays?? whats that?? Why this pre occupation against UMNO? I must be good at my blog. I take pains to research my stuff and to make it better than a Mao wall poster. Are you saying UMNO is good? Well maybe I ought to join if they will let an Indian in.
  7. Patrick C September 26, 2009 at 1:42 pm #
    A load of poisonous spit and character assasination at it’s most extreme! I am surprised you did not include his genes for his supposedly monstrous evil.
    • grkumar September 26, 2009 at 7:50 pm #
      it is character assassination where there is no fact and the allegations malicious and without foundation. I have invited the man to rebut the allegations of his former students and I am still waiting.
  8. Deacon 1957 September 28, 2009 at 6:26 am #
    he he, as a child he did not receive enough fatherly attention and grew up with a lot of penis envy so one way is to get back at young boys
    now whether he groped them or not I am not sure but I have heard from elsewhere that he was a bully in school, students hated his ‘over-compensating’ ways
    • grkumar September 28, 2009 at 9:07 am #
      I don’t know about the fatherly attention bit. I do not have any information about any sexual abuse by this man nor have there been any references to his conduct in this regard. The evidence of his bullying and evidence of his collaboration with two known racist bullies, John Neo and Alban Senan has been corroborated independently by a large number of former students of his.
      All one really needs to be able to establish truth of the accusations directed against Bernard Khoo is one of these to be substantiated. Just one. We still welcome his rebuttals as he is entitled to.
  9. kassim September 28, 2009 at 9:31 am #
    kumar you are my man!
    can you dig up on haris ibrahim too?
    • grkumar September 28, 2009 at 9:58 pm #
      We do not dig up ‘dirt’ about anyone unless we have been provided with relevant and compelling evidence and to publish that evidence is relevant to something topical and in the public interest.
  10. ICE October 22, 2009 at 3:13 pm #
    GR Kumar,
    Do you have relevant and compelling evidence against Zorro Unmasked aka Bernard Khoo?
  11. Little bit October 23, 2009 at 2:47 pm #
    Yes Gopal you are very accurate about Bernard’s past, I ams sure there are many with a past, including Najib Tun Razak and even his father. I will be the first one to authenticate the truth about what you say about both Bernard and John Neo and I am a Catholic and a La Sallian from La Salle Klang, and even a victim of these people who preferred to look at those with money in a better light then us. I however can’t agree with you on the treatment of Malays Boys. Kamarulzaman Mohd Diah was my classmate, he was always first in the class, the last I knew he was working in Borneo Trading in Port Klang, what happened to him I can’t remember. I was retained in form three for a year and had another classmate Tawil Hj Sili if I spelt his name right and he became head prefect if I am not mistaken I let the school at that time, and this was during the days of John Neo and Bernard Khoo. For that matter even Najib Tun Razak was pupil of the Christian Brothers School. There were racialists in their ranks, given and I’ll not deny it, but there were those dedicated to the cause of education from whom sprang many successful and admirable Indians and Malays in society. Admission was open to all, but only a few Malays cme to the Christian Brothers School because they were Christian schools. Since you are from la Salle Klang, let me remind you that Sethu Raman a leading legal consultant was a product of the School, there are many more and many of them Indians. I had hard times in the school but today it has made me a better man those bad times.
  12. grkumar October 23, 2009 at 8:00 pm #
    I am not a product of that school. Never was. The article is the subject of interviews with people (the majority non Malays) who attended that school. The article was inspired by a reader of Zorro Unmasked.
    Tawil was a head prefect. A man of Indonesian origins. The information we have is that he was deliberately selected and given the task of making public announcements as well so that he could be ridiculed which he was for his English.
    It was apparently John Neos way of allowing the others to very subtely reinforce the idea that Malays were not very bright or were undeserving of the NEP (or its equivalent then).
    Anyway the position of head prefect was never one to hi lite leadership characteristics of the individual. It was never based on merit and their choices were never the best we are told.
    As to the other aspects of your comments there are racists everywhere, but that does not mean they ought to go unchecked especially where they make allegations of others’ shortcommings in this respect.
    Thank you for your comments
    GRK
  13. grkumar October 24, 2009 at 12:08 am #
    “A torn jacket is soon mended; but hard words bruise the heart of a child”.
    Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.
  14. chris October 28, 2009 at 4:51 am #
    As expected , you didn’t publish my article.Thanks.By now you would have read about the incidence in Perak where one is confirmed dead and 2 more stilling missing and the chance is, they dead too. Ask your self, why the accident happened? Bcoz, the pupils are not disciplined.Do you think any pupils would have jumped and shake the suspension bridge , if somebody like ZORRo around.It doesnt matter the dead are indians, life is life, gone, won’t come back.IF YOU ARE THE PARENTS OF THE DEAD GIRLS, WON’T YOU WISH SOMEBODY LIKE ZORRO WAS THERE TO KEEP AN EVIL ( as you put it) OVER YOUR CHILD.BE EMPATHY NOT SYMPATHY.There is a hell of different between the two.Take your time and think and think.
    I don’t care if you read or publish this but your action shows yourself.
  15. chris October 30, 2009 at 2:50 pm #
    So now, about publishing my earlier two articles, so the readers can judge you???
    My question to u on the 3rd article which u choose to publish is standing.
  16. tim December 21, 2009 at 5:27 am #
    …for a long time I thought of unmasking him myself but decided he was not worth the sand he stands on. Your article, though poignant it may seem, has only skimmed the surface on this character. This guy’s got skeletons that can make any cemetery look like a public park. It looks like Hitler survived, re-invented himself and came back as an activist. Recently, he was called in by the boys in blue. I hope they find enough to put him away….and throw away the key. Not the ISA though. That would only make him more of a hero. If this guy stood for elections, he wouldn’t even get enough votes for a City Hall’s Dog-Catcher’s post.
    Thanks mate for the expose. Tha’s a load off my shoulders.
    tim
    • grkumar December 22, 2009 at 10:49 pm #
      We have had a number of emails from former La Sallians about a number of these bullies (for want of a better word). The Catholic brotherhood and the priesthood appear for some reason (at least with the benefit of information we have) to have attracted a bunch of social misfits and sadists who preyed on young boys and women throughout not only Malaysia but also in other countries.
      There is also in fairness to the church a history of excellent and selfless work by missionaries. Most of these whether we like it or not were from the European, English and Irish who had genuine vocations that drove them into educating the vulnerable and the weak. Brother Arnold had another offsider or like minded thug we are now pursuing for another reason. Alban Senan we are told is of Burmese descent. We have had the bile of his sychophants spliied on us. which we do not bother publishing because none of it is supported by evidence.
      Zorro is pathetic and a man without any cause, creed or character. He fills his time ranting and raving like that other lunatic on the run who believes himself to be a reincarnation of Joan of Arc or Robin Hood, Raja Petra Kamaruddin. Full of pious platitudes. he has not found in him the capaccity to at last ask for forgiveness of those he abused. He does not believe in the benefit of the doubt and neither will we.
      Forgiveness can only come with true repentance. His deeds were not isolated ones. They were part of his daily diet.
      GRK
    • Ghani February 5, 2012 at 6:45 pm #
      Wow! I did not know that others suffered from bullies of Arnold aka Bernard Khoo, Mathew Neoh, Alban and also Lucian. The last took the same class twice.
      I was in La Salle Klang 1958 – 1968.
      I am still emotionally scarred! Does anybody recall Brother Martin, the irish tyrant who had a Chinese nickname? Again he destroyed 2 years of our precious life in Standard 5 and 6
      • grkumar February 5, 2012 at 9:00 pm #
        “Arnold” aka Bernard Khoo aka Zorro continues to wallow in his misery
        and his pathetic sense of self righteousness and morality. These tyrants
        brought the whole idea of the Christian missions into disrepute by polluting
        the well of human kindness that they were meant to share with others and mould them
        into righteous men and women of good standing in our communities everywhere.
        Pity.
        GRK
      • grkumar October 12, 2012 at 11:08 am #
        apparently none of these named individuals were bullies and the story is made up by us and unfair to them. There’s more to come form those of us who “suffer from the delusions they actually existed”. Our lawyer was consulted by a “journalist” in KL threatening to “out him” instead of us. lets see.
        GRK
    • grkumar October 12, 2012 at 11:10 am #
      Yes he has the support of an activist “Journalist” blackmailing our lawyer in Australia (also a former Malaysian) threatening to out him for this articlke and for being a “Government agent and turncoat”.
  17. NIk "Netanyahu" Aziz February 7, 2012 at 4:16 am #
    Dear Gopal,
    It is high time you outed that buffoon Haris Ibrahim and teh snake Malik Imtiaz Server.
    One is a buffoon (a villainous one) of quixotic dimensions and the other the very sone of the serpent.
    keep taking out the trash!
    Nik Netanyahu
  18. tim November 20, 2012 at 4:58 pm #
    ….a by-product of the Paulinist Catholic Church which has nothing whatsoever to do with Yeshua (Jesus)
    • grkumar November 21, 2012 at 6:36 am #
      They may be Paulist in their doctrine but pure evil in their practice.

Monday, November 19, 2012

Sunday, November 18, 2012

perhaps a case of spiritual cataractism......



I.     When was Jesus born?
A.     Popular myth puts his birth on December 25th in the year 1 C.E.
B.     The New Testament gives no date or year for Jesus’ birth.  The earliest gospel – St. Mark’s, written about 65 CE – begins with the baptism of an adult Jesus.  This suggests that the earliest Christians lacked interest in or knowledge of Jesus’ birthdate.
C.     The year of Jesus birth was determined by Dionysius Exiguus, a Scythian monk, “abbot of a Roman monastery.  His calculation went as follows:
a.       In the Roman, pre-Christian era, years were counted from ab urbe condita (“the founding of the City” [Rome]).  Thus 1 AUC signifies the year Rome was founded, 5 AUC signifies the 5th year of Rome’s reign, etc.
b.     Dionysius received a tradition that the Roman emperor Augustus reigned 43 years, and was followed by the emperor Tiberius.
c.       Luke 3:1,23 indicates that when Jesus turned 30 years old, it was the 15th year of Tiberius reign.
d.      If Jesus was 30 years old in Tiberius’ reign, then he lived 15 years under Augustus (placing Jesus birth in Augustus’ 28th year of reign).
e.       Augustus took power in 727 AUC.  Therefore, Dionysius put Jesus birth in 754 AUC.
f.        However, Luke 1:5 places Jesus’ birth in the days of Herod, and Herod died in 750 AUC – four years before the year in which Dionysius places Jesus birth.
D.     Joseph A. Fitzmyer – Professor Emeritus of Biblical Studies at the Catholic University of America, member of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, and former president of the Catholic Biblical Association – writing in the Catholic Church’s official commentary on the New Testament[1], writes about the date of Jesus’ birth, “Though the year [of Jesus birth is not reckoned with certainty, the birth did not occur in AD 1.  The Christian era, supposed to have its starting point in the year of Jesus birth, is based on a miscalculation introduced ca. 533 by Dionysius Exiguus.”
E.      The DePascha Computus, an anonymous document believed to have been written in North Africa around 243 CE, placed Jesus birth on March 28.  Clement, a bishop of Alexandria (d. ca. 215 CE), thought Jesus was born on November 18.  Based on historical records, Fitzmyer guesses that Jesus birth occurred on September 11, 3 BCE.
 

II.     How Did Christmas Come to Be Celebrated on December 25?

A.    Roman pagans first introduced the holiday of Saturnalia, a week long period of lawlessness celebrated between December 17-25.  During this period, Roman courts were closed, and Roman law dictated that no one could be punished for damaging property or injuring people during the weeklong celebration.  The festival began when Roman authorities chose “an enemy of the Roman people” to represent the “Lord of Misrule.”  Each Roman community selected a victim whom they forced to indulge in food and other physical pleasures throughout the week.  At the festival’s conclusion, December 25th, Roman authorities believed they were destroying the forces of darkness by brutally murdering this innocent man or woman.
B.    The ancient Greek writer poet and historian Lucian (in his dialogue entitled Saturnalia) describes the festival’s observance in his time.  In addition to human sacrifice, he mentions these customs: widespread intoxication; going from house to house while singing naked; rape and other sexual license; and consuming human-shaped biscuits (still produced in some English and most German bakeries during the Christmas season).
C.    In the 4th century CE, Christianity imported the Saturnalia festival hoping to take the pagan masses in with it.  Christian leaders succeeded in converting to Christianity large numbers of pagans by promising them that they could continue to celebrate the Saturnalia as Christians.[2]
D.    The problem was that there was nothing intrinsically Christian about Saturnalia. To remedy this, these Christian leaders named Saturnalia’s concluding day, December 25th, to be Jesus’ birthday.
E.      Christians had little success, however, refining the practices of Saturnalia.  As Stephen Nissenbaum, professor history at the University of Massachussetts, Amherst, writes, “In return for ensuring massive observance of the anniversary of the Savior’s birth by assigning it to this resonant date, the Church for its part tacitly agreed to allow the holiday to be celebrated more or less the way it had always been.”  The earliest Christmas holidays were celebrated by drinking, sexual indulgence, singing naked in the streets (a precursor of modern caroling), etc.
F.      The Reverend Increase Mather of Boston observed in 1687 that “the early Christians who  first observed the Nativity on December 25 did not do so thinking that Christ was born in that Month, but because the Heathens’ Saturnalia was at that time kept in Rome, and they were willing to have those Pagan Holidays metamorphosed into Christian ones.”[3]  Because of its known pagan origin, Christmas was banned by the Puritans and its observance was illegal in Massachusetts between 1659 and 1681.[4]  However, Christmas was and still is celebrated by most Christians.
G.    Some of the most depraved customs of the Saturnalia carnival were intentionally revived by the Catholic Church in 1466 when Pope Paul II, for the amusement of his Roman citizens, forced Jews to race naked through the streets of the city.  An eyewitness account reports, “Before they were to run, the Jews were richly fed, so as to make the race more difficult for them and at the same time more amusing for spectators.  They ran… amid Rome’s taunting shrieks and peals of laughter, while the Holy Father stood upon a richly ornamented balcony and laughed heartily.”[5]
H.     As part of the Saturnalia carnival throughout the 18th and 19th centuries CE, rabbis of the ghetto in Rome were forced to wear clownish outfits and march through the city streets to the jeers of the crowd, pelted by a variety of missiles. When the Jewish community of Rome sent a petition in1836 to Pope Gregory XVI begging him to stop the annual Saturnalia abuse of the Jewish community, he responded, “It is not opportune to make any innovation.”[6]  On December 25, 1881, Christian leaders whipped the Polish masses into Antisemitic frenzies that led to riots across the country.  In Warsaw 12 Jews were brutally murdered, huge numbers maimed, and many Jewish women were raped.  Two million rubles worth of property was destroyed.
 

III.     The Origins of Christmas Customs

A.     The Origin of Christmas Tree
Just as early Christians recruited Roman pagans by associating Christmas with the Saturnalia, so too worshippers of the Asheira cult and its offshoots were recruited by the Church sanctioning “Christmas Trees”.[7]  Pagans had long worshipped trees in the forest, or brought them into their homes and decorated them, and this observance was adopted and painted with a Christian veneer by the Church.
B.     The Origin of Mistletoe
Norse mythology recounts how the god Balder was killed using a mistletoe arrow by his rival god Hoder while fighting for the female Nanna.  Druid rituals use mistletoe to poison their human sacrificial victim.[8]  The Christian custom of “kissing under the mistletoe” is a later synthesis of the sexual license of Saturnalia with the Druidic sacrificial cult.[9]
C.     The Origin of Christmas Presents
In pre-Christian
Rome, the emperors compelled their most despised citizens to bring offerings and gifts during the Saturnalia (in December) and Kalends (in January).  Later, this ritual expanded to include gift-giving among the general populace.  The Catholic Church gave this custom a Christian flavor by re-rooting it in the supposed gift-giving of Saint Nicholas (see below).[10]
D.     The Origin of Santa Claus
a.       Nicholas was born in Parara, Turkey in 270 CE and later became Bishop of Myra.  He died in 345 CE on December 6th.  He was only named a saint in the 19th century.
b.      Nicholas was among the most senior bishops who convened the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE and created the New Testament.  The text they produced portrayed Jews as “the children of the devil”[11] who sentenced Jesus to death.
c.       In 1087, a group of sailors who idolized Nicholas moved his bones from Turkey to a sanctuary in Bari, Italy.  There Nicholas supplanted a female boon-giving deity called The Grandmother, or Pasqua Epiphania, who used to fill the children's stockings with her gifts.  The Grandmother was ousted from her shrine at Bari, which became the center of the Nicholas cult.  Members of this group gave each other gifts during a pageant they conducted annually on the anniversary of Nicholas’ death, December 6.
d.      The Nicholas cult spread north until it was adopted by German and Celtic pagans.  These groups worshipped a pantheon led by Woden –their chief god and the father of Thor, Balder, and Tiw.  Woden had a long, white beard and rode a horse through the heavens one evening each Autumn.  When Nicholas merged with Woden, he shed his Mediterranean appearance, grew a beard, mounted a flying horse, rescheduled his flight for December, and donned heavy winter clothing.
e.       In a bid for pagan adherents in Northern Europe, the Catholic Church adopted the Nicholas cult and taught that he did (and they should) distribute gifts on December 25th instead of December 6th.
f.        In 1809, the novelist Washington Irving (most famous his The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Rip Van Winkle) wrote a satire of Dutch culture entitled Knickerbocker History.  The satire refers several times to the white bearded, flying-horse riding Saint Nicholas using his Dutch name, Santa Claus.
g.       Dr. Clement Moore, a professor at Union Seminary, read Knickerbocker History, and in 1822 he published a poem based on the character Santa Claus: “Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house, not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse.  The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, in the hope that Saint Nicholas soon would be there…”  Moore innovated by portraying a Santa with eight reindeer who descended through chimneys.
h.       The Bavarian illustrator Thomas Nast almost completed the modern picture of Santa Claus.  From 1862 through 1886, based on Moore’s poem, Nast drew more than 2,200 cartoon images of Santa for Harper’s Weekly.  Before Nast, Saint Nicholas had been pictured as everything from a stern looking bishop to a gnome-like figure in a frock.  Nast also gave Santa a home at the North Pole, his workshop filled with elves, and his list of the good and bad children of the world.  All Santa was missing was his red outfit.
i.         In 1931, the Coca Cola Corporation contracted the Swedish commercial artist Haddon Sundblom to create a coke-drinking Santa.  Sundblom modeled his Santa on his friend Lou Prentice, chosen for his cheerful, chubby face.  The corporation insisted that Santa’s fur-trimmed suit be bright, Coca Cola red.  And Santa was born – a blend of Christian crusader, pagan god, and commercial idol.
 

IV.     The Christmas Challenge

·        Christmas has always been a holiday celebrated carelessly.  For millennia, pagans, Christians, and even Jews have been swept away in the season’s festivities, and very few people ever pause to consider the celebration’s intrinsic meaning, history, or origins.
·       Christmas celebrates the birth of the Christian god who came to rescue mankind from the “curse of the Torah.”  It is a 24-hour declaration that Judaism is no longer valid.
·        Christmas is a lie.  There is no Christian church with a tradition that Jesus was really born on December 25th.
·        December 25 is a day on which Jews have been shamed, tortured, and murdered.
·        Many of the most popular Christmas customs – including Christmas trees, mistletoe, Christmas presents, and Santa Claus – are modern incarnations of the most depraved pagan rituals ever practiced on earth.

Many who are excitedly preparing for their Christmas celebrations would prefer not knowing about the holiday’s real significance.  If they do know the history, they often object that their celebration has nothing to do with the holiday’s monstrous history and meaning.  “We are just having fun.”
Imagine that between 1933-45, the Nazi regime celebrated Adolf Hitler’s birthday – April 20 – as a holiday.  Imagine that they named the day, “Hitlerday,” and observed the day with feasting, drunkenness, gift-giving, and various pagan practices.  Imagine that on that day, Jews were historically subject to perverse tortures and abuse, and that this continued for centuries.
Now, imagine that your great-great-great-grandchildren were about to celebrate Hitlerday.  April 20th arrived. They had long forgotten about Auschwitz and Bergen Belsen.  They had never heard of gas chambers or death marches.  They had purchased champagne and caviar, and were about to begin the party, when someone reminded them of the day’s real history and their ancestors’ agony.  Imagine that they initially objected, “We aren’t celebrating the Holocaust; we’re just having a little Hitlerday party.”  If you could travel forward in time and meet them; if you could say a few words to them, what would you advise them to do on Hitlerday?
On December 25, 1941, Julius Streicher, one of the most vicious of Hitler’s assistants, celebrated Christmas by penning the following editorial in his rabidly Antisemitic newspaper, Der Stuermer:
If one really wants to put an end to the continued prospering of this curse from heaven that is the Jewish blood, there is only one way to do it: to eradicate this people, this Satan’s son, root and branch.
It was an appropriate thought for the day.  This Christmas, how will we celebrate?
AUTHOR: LAWRENCE KELEMEN